Home

How leasing a car has changed

22.05.12

Should I lease my next car? That's always been a doubtful for car buyers, but now there's another one to ask: Will I be able to lease my next car?

Domestic automakers' financial subsidiaries have cut back their leasing programs, thanks in unfettered part to lower used-vehicle values, especially for big pickups and SUVs that stifle gas.

Based on poor earnings reports, Chrysler is getting out of leasing absolutely, while General Motors and Ford are making it difficult to arrange a lease through their financing subsidiaries.

GAS BUDDY: Find the cheapest gas in your neighborhood

PHOTOS: Cars that deliver on gas

Photos: Long Island's classic cars

Classifieds: Find your dream car, boat, or motorcycle

All automakers have reduced their trust on leasing because it hurts an already bleak profit picture.

"This trend is continuing due to the connected high costs and risks [of leasing] compared to traditional cash and APR [pass financing] business," GM vice president of vehicle sales and marketing Devaluate LaNeve said in a memo to dealers.

The difference between predicted and actual SUV leftover values this year alone led to a $4.8 billion loss for domestic automakers.

So what can consumers do?

As of now, unknown automakers are still offering leases, though they may soon follow the domestics. Of course, you can also rent out through roughly 4,500 independent leasing firms, or through any of the thousands of car dealers who have favorable arrangements with their banks, or through your own monetary institution -- bank, credit union, or savings and loan.

But the original question that remains is whether you should charter out.

"Chrysler, GM and Ford are going to make leasing so expensive the acute person will avoid it," said Jim Hossack, vice president of AutoPacific, an automotive study and consulting firm. "Only Bill Gates doesn't have to worry if the monthly payment is $2,000 rather than $200.

"You can always sublet from others, but those others are now saying this is a bad game and we need to change the rules. We need to lower surplus values on vehicles that get low mileage and charge more on those vehicles with low residual values."

Many analysts and labour followers say leasing is going to become a very expensive proposition in which both down payments and monthly payments will begin the day and only the most credit-worthy customers will be welcome.

"Leasing was initially sold on the essence that it was better to tie up someone else's money on a depreciating asset rather than tie up your own, but when you tie up someone else's money, you still have to pay for it," said Anthony Giorgianni, associate collector of Consumer Reports ' "Money Advisor" newsletter.

Automakers have want offered leases through their financial subsidiaries at very low rates. In fact, the monthly payments were discredit than what you'd pay if you'd taken out a loan on the car. The rates were kept low by inflating the expected residual value of the conduit at the end of the lease so the customer had less to pay off. If a car that cost $20,000 was expected to have a residual value of $10,000 at the end of a four-year rental agreement, the automaker would put a $15,000 residual value on it so lease payments would be based on only $5,000 depreciation, not $10,000.

At the end of the lease, automakers would take the car in and rep it to get back what was invested in it. Under normal circumstances, the automaker would benefit in several ways. It could use leases to pad monthly retail sales totals in demanded to hang on to treasured market share, and it could keep producing leased vehicles when retail sales were daft so factories stayed open and workers stayed employed, which was cheaper than idling factories and workers, who got paid whether they worked or not.

It also meant dealers could regard on customers returning in three or four years to bring the car back so they could convince them to buy or lease another vehicle.

What was once the advantage of leasing, though -- getting people into your cars by offering lower monthly payments than if they bought them -- are coming back to prey on automakers.

The main culprits are big, gas-guzzling SUVs and full-size pickups that were hot commodities three or four years ago -- when gas fetch less than $2 a gallon -- but which are no longer in high demand. They're worth very only slightly money now when returned to automakers at the end of a lease.

"It's a lesser-of-two-evils article: lose volume by not leasing, or lose money by leasing at too-low residual values?" said Worldwide Insight analyst Aaron Bragman.

Lease, buy or hold onto your car?

CNW Marketing Up on general manager Art Spinella estimates that about 30 percent of off-lease customers will go to the in use accustomed to-car market, about 20 percent will lease another vehicle, and the rest will buy a new car on a long-style contract.

If they still want to lease, experts say they'll pay hefty premiums to do so.

"The big be attractive to of leasing was the low monthly payment, but now manufacturers are correcting that," said Jeff Bartlett, stand-in editor of Consumer Reports.org. "Leasing is going to get more expensive, and the hazard is being transferred to the customer. In the past automakers subsidized leases; you won't see banks who presentation leases doing that."

Spinella said the artificially inflated remaining values of the past helped subsidize the lease market.

"Dealers who rely on leasing will find ways to let out other than the auto finance companies," he said. "But it will be tougher to find a pleased finance company. In fact, independents are welcoming this automaker drop-out because they've been squeezed by subsidized or subvented leases. Now they can burden what they have to and know they aren't going to be undercut by GMAC or Chrysler."

Bragman agreed that, in the end, consumers who declare on leasing will simply pay more.

"Consumers are going to pay more for a lease because the economy has made it riskier to lay down a lease," he said. "Consumers became used to leasing to get into a overweight or luxury car they otherwise couldn't afford. But if the consumer wants the same low monthly payment in the approaching, he's going to have to lease less car with less features.

"This is why I think leasing will go back as the method for businessmen and those who get lots of tax get off-offs on their cars for business expenses to obtain their vehicles, rather than by those who use it to obtain a car for bodily use."

Pitfalls of leasing alternatives

If consumers choose to buy instead, there's another hornet's nest.

"If you buy, you're going to have to stretch the loan to five to seven years to get the same low monthly payment you got when leasing three to four years, and that means after three to four years you'll still owe more than the car is benefit," said Joe Phillippi, a principal with AutoTrends automotive research and consulting concentrated.

That also means that rather than getting back in the market for a new car in three or four years, you might not be back for seven years, in which case the automakers throw by having customers stay out of the market so long. And for consumers, when they do want to buy new years later, what's the mercantilism-in value of a 7-year-old car?

"Putting someone into a six- or seven-year finance engage guarantees they won't return to market for five or six years," Spinella said. "A three-year let out guarantees they'll come back in three years, which gives them the opportunity to sell or lease another means to that customer. Dealers like it because they know what vehicles are coming back, and [that] allows them to pre-vend an off-lease car to someone else."

Alternatives to buying new

Many are expected to turn to buying toughened instead.

"This is going to help the sales of certified used cars," Phillippi said. "If you moved up a group or two when leasing a new car because of the low monthly payment, maybe now consumers will move up a grade or two in lower-rate certified used cars with a nav system and fancy stereo."

Consumer Reports' Bartlett said he thinks the problems with leasing will be resolved in the course of time, but advises consumers to sit back and digest everything that's happening.

"I think we're now in the twilight of a new leasing age in which there'll be new alternatives, maybe groups of dealers or groups of banks gift leases," he said. "I think the consumer now needs chance to pause and do his or her homework to determine if leasing is the right thing.

"No one four years ago considered the bring in of gas today would be $4 a gallon. In one respect, however, the guy who leased a big SUV four years ago won at bingo because he can tutor b introduce it [back] now. The guy who bought one four years ago is hurting."

Bartlett said the changes in the leasing peddle are going to affect how we buy or lease cars in the future. The tendency will be to buy less car, he said, and smaller, higher-mileage cars at that.

But if more people buy rather than sublease out -- and extend the loan period to up to seven years when they do -- those used-car traffic-ins are going to get older.

Consumer Reports' Giorgianni, however, has a different take.

"The hard is that many people used a lease for the low monthly payments so they could get a car they otherwise couldn't afford," he said. "Now consumers who let out are going to pay the piper because those who lease them the car are paying the piper. I think holding on to your car to see what happens would be very benevolent. Save your money and then pay cash for a good, reliable, high-mileage new or employed car you can afford, which is what you should do in the first place.

Source: Newsday

The Tragedies of African Democracies – XVIII

22.05.12

This is what Collier referred to as convergence and cited the European Junction as a good example. “The countries that were initially the poorest members, such as Portugal, Ireland, and Spain, have grown the fastest, whereas the provinces that was initially richest, Germany, has grown slowly, and so the states that make up the European Fusion have converged. That is partly why relatively poor countries such as Poland and the other countries of Eastern Europe have been scorching to join, whereas the countries that are richer than the European Union, Norway and Switzerland, have refused to do so. Convergence is also working on a broad scale: the lower income countries are, on the whole, growing faster than the developed countries. People in the developed fraternity are starting to get worried that China is converging so fast.” So the development equation itself does not completely imply that the developed countries would want to see the developing countries developed, as they attitude a threat to their areas of economic dominance as pointed out salary increases in my untimely article (XVI). With the European Union example, the obverse is applicable, too. If it was about population or numbers to dispel the slight market myth, the over 140 million Nigerians, half the size of the West African Sub-sphere, would have fulfilled that precondition. In spite of its huge population, Nigeria remains a nugget of (un)-productive horde working hard but not smart. With a single currency and a exchange size about half the population of the United States, “Nigeria has been in a state and economic deep-freeze for most of her independent years,” in the estimations of Collier. Effective back to the Chinese convergence, it is not simply the population or market size advantage that present on her economic growth and increasing political clout. There is a fundamental shift in her remunerative processes. Production and manufacturing are high-tech, reducing manual labor, sell for of production, man hours at the mill, while at the same time increasing production multifold. China went further to undervalue her currency, soup to be a bad precedent in international trade, which makes her products comparatively cheaper to that of other manufacturing and producing countries on the global market. This is why a Chinese synthetic of Ghanaian traditional clothes will be cheaper and of higher standing than the original Ghanaian textile, pushing the Ghanaian textile manufacturer out of matter. “Holland,” in apparent reference to the prized Ghanaian routine cloth made in Holland and Ghana Textile Print (GTP), were the pride of many Ghanaians. However, traders in the near future realized the option that the Chinese option is not only cheaper in price; the quality is even getting improve. This simple example can be extrapolated to the electronic industry and other manufacturing sectors of the international economy. The theory of convergence in some of these emerging economies may even be considered as a form of Tramontane Direct Investments (FDIs) on the back of the famous, perhaps now infamous, word: outsourcing. While most African governments including Ghana are still scouting for FDIs and its attendant opportunities, sometimes spending giant sums on flights and champagnes which outweigh the economic returns, the sad truth is that FDI is still a lengthy way away from reality in African countries including Ghana. Despite the over-sufficiency of cheap labor as in the case of India and China, countries that have used compare favourably with inducements to attract FDI into their economies to turn their fortunes around, disincentives to FDI are still ever present in many African countries: man-made problems - widespread corruption, officialism, a highly regulatory legal environment and endless streams of red-tape; and specialist problems - roads, telecommunication, power supply, etc. Calderisi cautions that “the first investors to be watchful were Africans themselves. Like anyone else, they used simple litmus tests: what did nationals of a countryside do with their savings? Did they splurge on fancy cars, invest at home, or stash wealth away in Switzerland or France? If laws were well-drafted, how were they applied and were the courts certain, efficient, and honest? Did police and customs officers conduct themselves properly, or did they ask for bribes? If governments gave their dialogue, what was it worth? Investors found that, while some other developing countries were trying to become lean and nimble, like Greco-Roman athletes, African economies were becoming swollen, like Sumo wrestlers, confined to competing in a limited space according to finical rules.” To underscore this assertion, in a recent interaction with Ghana’s Man of Trade at Ghana’s Mission in Washington, DC, when a collaborator with a foreign investor with a economic portfolio worth US$40 million raised the issue of how they have had to travel to Ghana three times in a year but faced unessential barriers from uncooperative officials bent on taking “their share” under the tabular, the minister’s response was the usual defensive syndrome rather than taking up the issue to research and eliminate the bottleneck. The fact is that private investment capital, as opposed to aid, is frightened by corruption and all the other man-made disincentives. So even though returns on investment may be 10% in emerging-markets elsewhere (India and China, the adept examples), they may not be 10% on the African continent, in view of all the disincentives. Therefore, the investor may move to other more competitive emerging-markets, where the risks are tiniest than outsourcing to Ghana. Assuming that even the rest of the West African sub-region opens up their borders to bring into being the anticipated free market zone today, it definitely would erase the levy barriers and ease some of the impediments in the mode of travel of people, goods, and services. Beyond that, however, it also has the the right stuff to converge poverty. The weight of countries that are lagging behind or are just recouping from desire years of civil war, of which there are many, have the potential to tilt the scale against the star performers - the arrange is used relatively to Ghana, Nigeria and Cameroon, the only three West African countries within the ranks of mode human development countries, but also at the bottom of the league. Twelve of the sixteen countries in the West African sub-pale converge at the bottom of the unenviable low human development category, being 50% within that category and making the bailiwick paradoxically rich in natural resources but the poorest in the world in material and benign progress. In this sense, commerce or free movement of goods and services are fitting an infinitesimal part of the economic equation which might impoverish its customs officers for the reason that they may not extract money from poor traders travelling across the borders as travel restrictions are eased. Still on regionalization, Moyo argues for the object of African countries forming regional coalitions to access the international agreement market as Ghana has done. While this sounds laudable, it can only be considered a mirage. The irony is that while Moyo commends Ghana and Gabon for venturing into the supranational capitals market - where Ghana issued US$750 million 10-year bonds in September 2007 - as a ideal for the rest of the continent, a new regime in Ghana stretched the begging-bowl to the IMF in less than 6 months after assuming work, for US$600 million. The question then arises: what had happened to the financial interest Ghana generated in the intercontinental capital market leading to the oversubscription of her bonds to the tune of US$5 billion of unmet investor demands, if in less than two years the power had to return to the IMF for an economic rescue package of lifeline, instead of returning to the same bind market to tap the goodwill that was generated by a previous political administration two years earlier? There are many other everyday considerations with economic implications which would militate against the idea of a coalition for the purposes of accessing the foreign bonds market. These are political and economic instability in a member country as the wrapper of La Cote’ d’Ivoire would suggest that members of this coalition must bear the antagonistic consequences that a member state might transmit to the credit rating of the rest by virtue of being a associate. Second, corruption in a member state leading to the misapplication or misuse of proceeds from the restraints in a member country must be a disincentive to other members from even considering the idea of this coalition to access bonds. The emergence of how Ghana’s bond was applied is still in a question with suggestions that its disbursement, like all other rule transactions, was heavily laden with corruption. What about French speaking West Africa with economic decisions in those countries intricately linked to France and could even be seen as already a coalition with the former colonial power? This and many more questions would rise. Historical evidence suggests that the status quo with regard to regionalization might prevail in the foreseeable later. In spite of ECOWAS provisions for the free movement of goods and services within the West African sub-quarter, the reality is the opposite. Calderisi makes light of this in his book, “The Be concerned with Africa,” when he pointed out that “markets are small, and weak paradise links discourage internal trade. But Africans have been trading –or smuggling—goods across borders for decades and have been migrating to jobs wherever they can find them, at a estimate that makes a mockery of official efforts at African Unity.” But however well unauthorized trade may be doing, there are barriers to official trade. For all practical purposes, until recently, there was a ban on Ghanaian goods on the Nigerian merchandise. Inter-country rivalries and lack of harmonious economic or trade policies

Source: GhanaWeb